Current Issue : April-June Volume : 2025 Issue Number : 2 Articles : 5 Articles
Background/Objectives: Despite the effectiveness of exercise and nutritional interventions to improve aerobic capacity and quality of life in lung transplant (LT) recipients, their compliance is low. Strategies to reduce the high attrition rate (participants lost over time) is a major challenge. Artificial neural networks (ANN) may assist in the early identification of patients with high risk of attrition. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of ANNs to identify prognostic factors for high attrition rate of a 10-week rehabilitation program after a LT. Methods: This prospective observational study included first-time LT recipients over 18 years of age. The main outcome for each patient was the attrition rate, which was estimated by the amount of missing data accumulated during the study. Clinical variables including malnutrition, sarcopenia, and their individual components were assessed at baseline. An ANN and regression analysis were used to identify the factors determining a high attrition rate. Results: Of the 41 participants, 17 (41.4%) had a high rate of attrition in the rehabilitation program. Only 23 baseline variables had no missing data and were included in the analysis, from which a low age-dependent body mass index (BMI) was the most important conditioning factor for a high attrition rate (p = 7.08 × 10−5), followed by end-stage respiratory disease requiring PT (p = 0.000111), low health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) (p = 0.0009078), and low handgrip strength (p = 0.023). Conclusions: The prevalence of high attrition rate in LT recipients is high. The profile of patients with a high probability of attrition includes those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low BMI and handgrip strength, and reduced HRQoL....
Background/Objectives: Glucocorticoids are commonly used for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We aimed to investigate the prevalence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression and its association with metabolic disorders in stable KTRs on low-dose glucocorticoids. Methods: This cross-sectional study included adult KTRs on low-dose glucocorticoids. HPA axis suppression was defined as baseline morning cortisol < 5 μg/dL. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAS) and 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels were also assessed. Examined metabolic disorders included hypertension, dyslipidemia, central obesity and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Results: Eighty adult KTRs with a median 57 months (IQR 24–102) since transplantation were included in the study. The mean prednisolone dose was 5.0 ± 1.3 mg/day. Baseline cortisol < 5.0 μg/dL was observed in 27.5% of the KTRs. Participants with baseline cortisol < 5.0 μg/dL were older (55.1 vs. 47.4 years, p = 0.023) and had had a transplant for a longer time (101.4 vs. 67.0 months, p = 0.043), compared with the rest of the cohort. Baseline cortisol correlated positively with ACTH (rho = 0.544, p < 0.001), DHEAS (rho:0.459, p < 0.001) and UFC (rho: 0.377, p = 0.002). The area under the receiveroperating characteristic curve for ACTH as a predictor of baseline cortisol > 5.0 μg/dL was 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.89]. After adjustment for covariates, HPA axis suppression was not associated with the examined metabolic disorders. Conclusions: Our study showed that stable KTRs on chronic low-dose glucocorticoids exhibited an increased prevalence of HPA axis suppression. ACTH may serve as a surrogate biomarker for HPA axis activity in this population. Further research could evaluate the association of glucocorticoid-induced HPA axis inhibition with metabolic disorders....
Background and Objectives: Postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) is a significant challenge in liver transplantation (LT), leading to severe circulatory and metabolic complications. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), including remote IPC (RIPC), can mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury, although its efficacy in LT remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of paired RIPC, involving the application of RIPC to both the recipient and the living donor, on the incidence of PRS and the need for rescue epinephrine during living-donor LT (LDLT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational cohort analysis included 676 adult patients who had undergone elective LDLT between September 2012 and September 2022. After applying exclusion criteria and propensity score matching (PSM), 664 patients were categorized into the paired RIPC and non-RIPC groups. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of PRS and the need for rescue epinephrine during reperfusion. Results: The incidence of PRS and the need for rescue epinephrine were significantly lower in the paired RIPC group than in the non-RIPC group. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was lower in the paired RIPC group. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for propensity scores indicated that paired RIPC was significantly associated with a reduced occurrence of PRS (odds ratio: 0.672, 95% confidence interval: 0.479–0.953, p = 0.021). Conclusions: Paired RIPC, involving both the recipient and the living donor, effectively reduces the occurrence of PRS and the need for rescue epinephrine during LDLT. These findings suggest that paired RIPC protects against ischemiareperfusion injury in LDLT. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our results and to explore the underlying mechanisms of the protective effects of RIPC....
Liver transplants (LTs) are prioritized by mortality risk, which is estimated by MELD scores. Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present with lower MELD scores, they are allocated MELD exception points. Concerns persist that HCC recipients are over-prioritized, resulting in disproportionate waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients. We assessed whether the Median Meld at Transplant minus 3 (MMaT-3) scoring system would balance waitlist mortality and transplantation rates between HCC and non-HCC patients. We reviewed 266 patient charts listed for an LT from 2015 to 2023; 46.2% were listed in the MMaT-3 era. Amongst non-HCC patients, MMaT-3 implementation significantly increased 1-year transplant rate and reduced 1-year waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients (p = 0.003). Pre-MMaT-3 gaps in transplantation (p = 0.004) and waitlist dropout (p = 0.01) were eliminated post-implementation (p > 0.05). Amongst HCC patients, MMaT-3 implementation had no impact on the 1-year transplant rate (p = 0.92) or 1-year waitlist mortality (p = 0.66). Fine-gray proportional hazard multivariable analysis revealed that MMaT-3 significantly reduced waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients (asHR: 0.44, 95% CI [0.23, 0.83], p = 0.01) and limited impact on HCC patients (p = 0.31). MMaT-3 allocation did not significantly alter 2-year post-transplant survival for both populations. We show that the MMaT-3 system decreased the waitlist mortality of non-HCC patients with limited impacts on outcomes for HCC patients listed for an LT....
Background and Objectives: This study explored the effect of paired remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), involving both recipients and living donors, on cardiovascular stress in recipients after living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). The analysis included an assessment of the impact on cardiovascular biomarkers and post-transplant cardiovascular clinical events. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of 520 adult LDKT patients was conducted, employing propensity score matching (PSM) to analyze perioperative factors. The patients were allocated to no-RIPC (n = 260) and paired-RIPC (n = 260) groups. The two groups were compared with respect to high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, corrected QT (QTc) intervals, the occurrence of arrhythmia, and the requirement for cardiovascular interventions. Results: After PSM, there were no significant differences in perioperative parameters between the no-RIPC and paired-RIPC groups. However, on postoperative day (POD) 1, higher hsTnI levels and QTc interval prolongation, as well as higher incidences of arrhythmia and the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were determined in the no-RIPC group than in the paired-RIPC group. The associations between paired RIPC and improved cardiovascular outcomes were significant, including reduced odds of elevated hsTnI levels, QTc prolongation, and arrhythmia. The no-RIPC group also had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and higher rates of rescue dialysis. Conclusions: Paired-RIPC involving recipients and donors effectively reduces cardiovascular stress markers and improves postoperative cardiovascular outcomes in LDKT recipients, underscoring its potential as a protective strategy against perioperative cardiovascular risks....
Loading....